Impact of Service Tax in Public life of India
The most critical type of Service Tax is Goods
Transport Agency Service (in short GTA). Here, Service Tax is paid on the
freight amount of the Goods Vehicle. There is abatement of 75% of the freight
amount and Tax is paid on the 25% of the value of freight.
Who is
required to pay S.Tax?
As specified in Notifications No 35/2004, the consignor
or consignee who has paid the freight is required to pay Tax.
Who has
been specified in Notfn 35/2004?
Limited Companies, public or private, body
corporate, society & partnership.
Then what
Transporter & Transporter Agency is required to do so far GTA is concerned?
The Rule 4B of Service Tax Rules, 1994 says that
he has to issue a consignment note and tickmark in the consignment note as to
who will make payment of Service Tax, consignor/consignee/GTA. That means the
Service Tax provision has given them a responsibility to determine whether the consignor
or consignee or the GTA will make payment of Service Tax. What is practically
happening that a Transporting Agency is collecting Service Tax, keeping some
amount and depositing the rest amount as per his conscience and courage.
When the Goods
Transporting Agency (in short GTA) is required to pay S. Tax?
The GTA will pay only in cvases other than mentioned
in Norfn 35/2004 that means in case of individuals like Rama ,Vima & Shyama
etc & Hindu Undivided Family. When these individuals pay the freight and
such freight amount exceeds Rs 10 lakhs, then only GTA will pay Service Tax
otherwise NOT. What is happening is the reverse.
I know personally, there is a transporter in
front of Rajkumar College, Raipur (near Procee Commercial Training Institute)
Chhattisgarh who is not Regd and has not paid Service Tax for several years
even though it is a partnership firm and as per Notfn 35/2004, they have to pay
S.Tax.
The Service Receiver has to pay Tax from zero
point. Only GTA is entitled to avail the initial exemption of Rs 10 lakhs.
So, why it
is happening?
The inadequate staff of the Tax collecting department
and lack of will power, the level of honesty of tax payers & the level of
grasping power of professional Chartered Accountants in the field. Govt
officers say that they are too busy, Businessman as the name suggests is already
busy and C.A nods his head as per demand of the situation.
The short history
of the Tax
In spite of these facts, it is the largest
Revenue earning category of Service Tax. The reason is the all pervading Transport
system in a big country. Long back Service Tax was imposed on Transporters. At
that time, it was called “Goods Operator” Service. An unprecedented strike took
place in India. The Govt had to take back the law. It was again introduced in
1.1.2005 named as Goods Transport Agency ( in short GTA ).
Service tax was collected from Service providers
but in case of GTA, it was meant to be collected from Service receiver also. M/s
Lagh Bharti Udyog a Service Receiver contested on this point in Supreme Court
of India that when there is no provision in the charging section 66 of the
Finance Act, 1994 how the Govt of India can collect tax from Receiver. The
Supreme Court passed his verdict in favour of the party. The Govt therefore resorted
a revalidation provision. As per this provision, the Parliament can revalidate
a provision in spite of any decree, decision of a Court, Tribunal. So, Govt won
and Tax is being collected. According the mechanism of Reverse Charge was introduced
by making an amendment in Section 66 of the Finance Act, 1994
Paradox of
the Provision
Let me give an example which will elevate the
Service tax law to a position of piece of comedy. Sometime back, I purchased an
Air Conditioner, Pandri, Raipur, Chhattisgarh who is partnership firm. So, they
are covered under specified category. I have paid Rs 80/- as the freight and therefore
I am liable for payment of Service Tax. As per law, I have to visit Servivce
Tax Department, obtain a Service Tax Registration and pay Service Tax @12.36%
of Rs 80/- i.e Rs 9.88. Next, I will cancel Regn and will again apply for it,
in the next purcahse. What I will do, the rest of India is also required to do.
It is ridiculous. I ponder in 121 crore of people why there is not a single
person who can frame a rule with accuracy and clear cut provision.
Flash back
Now, it is 5.8 A.M. early morning. I realize the
power the parliament in Revalidation procedure in spite of Supreme Court
Ruling. That means in India i.e Bharat, the Parliament is supreme and not
Supreme Court. The power of the Parliamentarian took me into my childhood memory
when I was lean & thin boy studying in B.B High School, Pritipur, Cuttack,
Odisha. In Annual Function of the High School, the local MP visits, speaks to
the students and the final action was interesting at the time of departure. 2/3
live chickens were called by a subordinate staff of the said Representative and
practically thrown to the back side of the Commander jeep. The chickens cry
loud & loud and the chicken owners eyes give a blending expression of
proudness, pleasure and also at the same time unhappiness. He is proud & there
is reason of pleasure that his goods was required in such a big occasion. He is
unhappy as he was not paid before such forced purchase and there is a
possibility that he may not be paid. In fact, he was not paid.
I say to
myself who is powerful and now I fully realize the power of “Revalidating clause”